Thank you, Martin Attached is the snapshot including: left: base middle: cross-sectionlly process of the 2nd time point (total 2 time points) right: longitudinal process of the 2nd time point
It looks like nothing wrong before the longitudinal process.....
Yi-Yu
________________________________________ From: Martin Reuter [mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:57 AM To: Yiyu Chou Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Not label correctly on Longitudinal Procees on FS5.1
Yi-Yu,
yes, that should not happen.
Can you check the base and all other time points? Because if something is wrong there, it might influence the long runs. It could be that one of the time points has problems, therefore affecting the base?
Best, Martin
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:43 -0700, Yiyu Chou wrote:
Dear Freesurfer users,
I was running the longitudinal process using FS 5.1, but I noticed that the segmentation doesn't label voxels correctly on part of the cerebral-cortrex. Please have a look at the attached snapshot: Left: cross-sectionally process - looks good Right: longitudinal process - labels were not correct on cerebral-cortex (dash-line region). I wonder why the cross-sectionally process does a better job than the longitudinal one. Is there a way to fix it ? Or I have to manually edit aseg.mgz ? I would appreciate it if you can give me some suggestions. Thanks !!
Yi-Yu Chou _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
