why don't you tar and gzip the whole subject dir and upload it to our ftp site and we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 1 May 2018, Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Bruce,
The problem is that the reconstruction of the pial surface is incorrect. I tried to put control points on some voxels but did a wrong reconstruction because in this region there is no voxel with an intensity between 95-110. How can I improve the reconstruction of the pial surface (in this case extend) without modifying the boundaries of wm? . Sorry, I read the answer you gave to Saum but I could not understand very well how to modify the statistics that FreeSurfer does in the mri_make_surfaces.
Hi Saum
it is, but you need to figure out why it isn't getting out far enough. The easiest way is to override the intensity statistics that are computed automatically in mris_make_surfaces. You can see them if you look in your recon-all.log. For example if the lowest value gm is allowed to be at the pial surface is too high, then it will settle too far in
Thanks,
Cheers,
2018-04-29 17:33 GMT+02:00 Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: that looks like a big temporal lobe bias field to me. Is the WM in the temporal lobes significantly darker than 110? I can't tell if some of the stuff in e.g. the left medial temporal lobe is WM or GM. Try putting some control points in regions where the intensity is in say [95, 110) and see if that helps
cheers Bruce On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi guys, I have the same problem as Saum, I executed the recon-all in several subjects and I did not obtain a completely correct segmentation of the pial surface. To solve this error could I use the control points? When I use the control points, will I also be able to correct the white matter segmentation? I send you a image if you want to check it. Thank you very much! Cheers, [IMAGE] 2018-04-27 21:28 GMT+02:00 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>: Hi Saum it is, but you need to figure out why it isn't getting out far enough. The easiest way is to override the intensity statistics that are computed automatically in mris_make_surfaces. You can see them if you look in your recon-all.log. For example if the lowest value gm is allowed to be at the pial surface is too high, then it will settle too far in cheers Bruce On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Saum Naderi wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi guys, I'm having some trouble extending the pial surface of my bm volume. I am aware that the general procedure for extending the pial is to extend the wm first and the pial will follow. However, is it possible to extend the pial surface without affecting the wm boundary? Thanks, Saum _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. -- Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
-- Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández