I see now, thanks for the answer. If I may, is there any particular reason why such a disparity between two subjects, is this due to anatomical variability between individuals? I was surprised by the 9,000 values that was missing.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
The entire medial wall has thickness values of 0 because there is no cortex there. There needs to be a surface in that area because we need a closed surface.
On 10/12/16 8:10 PM, Taha Abdullah wrote:
Hello All,
Quick question, I ran recon-all with the qcache option and after converting the ?.thickness.fsaverage.mgh to an ascii text file via mri_convert I am noticing some vertices have 0mm thickness and it varies, for example, one subject had 53 vertices labeled as zeros while another had over 9,000 vertices. Is there a method I can use to have a thickness value for each of the 163000+ vertices? I am not sure if this is a possible registration issue to mni305.
Thanks in advance, Taha -- *Taha Abdullah* *Department of Physiology,*
*Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine * *MS in Physiology and Biophysics, Georgetown University 2015* *Work Cell: (312)-451-8468 <%28312%29-451-8468>*
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.