Thanks very much for your help Martin !
of course we cite both NeuroImage papers, 2012 and 2010 in the description of methods.
Have a great week !
Alex.
Le 18/8 19:37 Martin Reuter a écrit :
Yes sounds good. Maybe say "depending on the number and spacing of time points" . As distance in time is also important.
And maybe you want to cite our longitudinal paper 2012 neuroimage within subject template ...
Good luck with your paper. Best Martin
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S^(TM) III, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message -------- From: Alex Hanganu al.hanganu@yahoo.ca Date: To: FS Mailing List Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Cc: Martin Reuter mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Longitudinal Two stage model limitations
Dear Martin,
we used the longitudinal two stage model for our analysis and we are writing the manuscript. In the discussions we want to add the limitations of this procedure, asdescribed in the wiki.
We want to say that this model "does not account for different certainty of within subject slopes depending on the number of time points,but we usedthe same number of time points for all subjects, so this disadvantage was diminished considerably".
Can you please tell if this sentence is correct, and if I understood correctly this limitation ?
Thanks, Alex.
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.