Yes
On 7/8/2020 9:01 PM, Hye Min Shin wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Thank you for the response.
Just to clarify, when you say as long as the surface reconstruction is correct do you mean that the surface should not have any gross defects and surfaces such as the pial surface show correct wm/gm boundaries?
Best, Julia Shin
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:13:50 -0400 From: "Douglas N. Greve" <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu mailto:dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Question about 3T images and brain atlas compatibility To: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Message-ID: <f5adfe37-3db5-9b5c-1ad7-3a1537996ee6@mgh.harvard.edu mailto:f5adfe37-3db5-9b5c-1ad7-3a1537996ee6@mgh.harvard.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
This is a surface-based atlas, so it is not sensitive to field strength as long as the surface reconstruction is correct because surfaces align with curvature and not intensity
On 7/8/2020 12:39 AM, Hye Min Shin wrote:
????????External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
I wanted to extract brain morphometry data (cortical thickness, surface areas, volume, etc) using PALS-B12 atlas. I have some 3T MRI images that I have preprocessed using Freesurfer 3T flag.
I am wondering if it would be ok to extract MRI data from 3T images on atlases such as PALS-B12. How do we know whether certain atlases are insensitive to field strength?
Best, Julia Shin
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer