Hi Bruce,
How are you matching the BW for T2-SPACE vs. MPRAGE -- the former
typically has a BW around 700+ Hz/Px, while the latter is typically around
200 Hz/Px.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mharms@wustl.edu
On 11/20/12 8:11 PM, "Bruce Fischl"
fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>Hi Matt
>I doubt you could accurately correct the 0.25mm distortions that would be
>widespread, not to mention the extra interpolation. Much better to
>distortion match the acquisitions
>Bruce
>
>
>
>On Nov 20, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Matt Glasser
matt@ma-tea.com wrote:
>
>> You can correct the readout distortion with a field map. The main
>> residual is just signal loss in the gradient echo image.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> On 11/20/12 7:22 PM, "Bruce Fischl"
fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>
>>> sure. Note that whichever you do it's absolutely critical to bandwidth
>>> and readout match them so there is no differential distortion between
>>>the
>>> contrast types
>>> Bruce
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:
>>>
>>>> thanks matt and bruce. this is very helpful.
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> satra
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Bruce Fischl
>>>>
fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> wrote:
>>>> yes, that's probably true. The FLAIR we use is just a T2-SPACE
>>>> scan with an inversion pulse to put CSF at the null point, so if
>>>> you can get T2-space at .7 you should be able to get FLAIR
>>>> (although you do burn some SNR with the inversion)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Matt Glasser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> Can you get good FLAIRs at 0.7mm isotropic?
>>>>
>>>> The fluid thing makes sense for surface
>>>> reconstruction, but I think it
>>>> would mess up myelin maps if someone also wanted to
>>>> do that using the
>>>> ratio method. If the CSF is now dark and you divide
>>>> the dark CSF in the
>>>> T1w with dark CSF in the T2w, you would get
>>>> unpredictable results in the
>>>> partial volume region along the edge.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/20/12 6:27 PM, "Bruce Fischl"
>>>>
fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Satra
>>>>
>>>> the T1 maps accomplish much of what the
>>>> ratio does - it gets rid of
>>>> receive bias effects. I'm not really
>>>> sure which is better. They are about
>>>> the same amount of scan time.
>>>>
>>>> The advantage of including the flair
>>>> inversion pulse in the T2 space is
>>>> that it nulls fluid and lets intensities
>>>> by monotonically decreasing
>>>> moving
>>>> outwards from the gray/white boundary.
>>>> This makes partial volume effects
>>>> less of a problem. Dura is also pretty
>>>> much totally absent from the FLAIR
>>>> and in the prelim data that we've
>>>> processed having the FLAIR images lets
>>>> the surface recover from pretty much all
>>>> mistakes in which dura is
>>>> included
>>>> in the pial surface.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Matt Glasser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If you make a T1 map you can
>>>> use that to look at
>>>> differences in myelin
>>>> content, but I don't know
>>>> all of the ways to calculate
>>>> T1 or if you
>>>> could
>>>> get that from only two flip
>>>> angles. Two images with
>>>> roughly the same
>>>> contrast won't work for the
>>>> ratio method. You need to
>>>> have opposite
>>>> contrast.
>>>>
>>>> Also I'm not sure how a
>>>> FLAIR would be better than a
>>>> T2-SPACE.
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> From: Satrajit Ghosh
>>>>
satra@mit.edu
>>>> Date: Tuesday, November 20,
>>>> 2012 5:51 PM
>>>> To: Matt Glasser
>>>>
matt@ma-tea.com
>>>> Cc: "Watson, Christopher"
>>>>
Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu,
>>>> "Winter, Warren"
>>>>
Warren.Winter@childrens.harvard.edu,
>>>> "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
>>>>
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer]
>>>> Tool for incorporating
>>>> T2-SPACE data in pial
>>>> surface recons?
>>>>
>>>> hi
>>>> matt: could you generate the
>>>> myelin maps say from two
>>>> flash scans at
>>>> different flip angles?
>>>> bruce: if one had a choice
>>>> between an mprage + t2 flair
>>>> and 2 flash
>>>> scans at
>>>> 5/20 flip angles, what would
>>>> be your recommendation?
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> satra
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:35
>>>> PM, Matt Glasser
>>>>
matt@ma-tea.com wrote:
>>>> If you get an MPRAGE
>>>> and T2-SPACE you can make
>>>> myelin maps too.
>>>> FreeSurfer's final
>>>> surface placement benefits a
>>>> lot from high
>>>> resolution
>>>> images (less than 1mm)
>>>> and you can still get good
>>>> SNR with when
>>>> you use
>>>> 32-channel coils.
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/20/12 4:41 PM,
>>>> "Bruce Fischl"
>>>>
fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, definitely. The
>>>> t2-space flair is a big help
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 20, 2012, at
>>>> 5:40 PM, "Watson,
>>>> Christopher"
>>>>
>>>>>
Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>>> So would you
>>>> recommend acquiring a T2 in
>>>> addition to an
>>>>>> (ME)MPRAGE/SPGR? i.e.
>>>> is it worth squeezing
>>>> another
>>>> acquisition into a
>>>>>> protocol?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>> From:
>>>> freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>
>>>>>> [freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>>>> on behalf of Bruce
>>>> Fischl
>>>>
>>>>>> [fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday,
>>>> November 20, 2012 3:01 PM
>>>>>> To: Winter, Warren
>>>>>> Cc:
>>>> freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>> Subject: Re:
>>>> [Freesurfer] Tool for
>>>> incorporating T2-SPACE
>>>> data in pial
>>>>>> surface recons?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Warren
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes, it will be part
>>>> of the upcoming 5.2 release,
>>>> hopefully
>>>> in Dec. It
>>>>>> will use either a
>>>> FLAIR or T2 (ideally
>>>> T2-SPACE for either
>>>> one)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>> On Tue, 20
>>>>>> Nov 2012, Winter,
>>>> Warren wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Back in January and
>>>> October Bruce mentioned that
>>>> he had
>>>> under
>>>>>>> development some
>>>> scripts designed to utilize
>>>> T2-SPACE images
>>>> for better
>>>>>>> pial surface
>>>> reconstruction in the
>>>> presence of dura -- I was
>>>> just
>>>>>>> wondering if any of
>>>> that is ready for trial?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warren
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Warren Winter
>>>>>>> Research
>>>> Coordinator
>>>>>>> Boston Children's
>>>> Hospital
>>>>>>> Sheridan Laboratory
>>>> of Cognitive Neuroscience
>>>>>>> Division of
>>>> Developmental Medicine
>>>>>>> 1 Autumn Street, AU
>>>> 650
>>>>>>> Boston, MA 02215
>>>>>>> 857-218-5224
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing
>>>> list
>>>>>>>
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing
>>>> list
>>>>>>
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The information in
>>>> this e-mail is intended only
>>>> for the
>>>> person to whom
>>>>>> it is
>>>>>> addressed. If you
>>>> believe this e-mail was sent
>>>> to you in
>>>> error and the
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> contains patient
>>>> information, please contact
>>>> the Partners
>>>> Compliance
>>>>>> HelpLine at
>>>>>>
>>>>
http://www.partners.org/complianceline
>>>> . If the e-mail was
>>>> sent to you
>>>>>> in error
>>>>>> but does not contain
>>>> patient information, please
>>>> contact the
>>>> sender and
>>>>>> properly
>>>>>> dispose of the
>>>> e-mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Freesurfer mailing
>>>> list
>>>>
>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing
>>>> list
>>>>
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Freesurfer mailing list
>Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer