External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer mailing list,
I am trying to get to the bottom of a discrepancy between two surface based images generated from the output of an LME analysis. The surfaces in row 1 of the attached image were generated by loading the four FDR significant clusters that were >100mm^2 in the cluster summary file. The surfaces in row 2 of the attached image were generated by loading the significance map generated for the same fixed effect (saved from the LME), and thresholding at the FDR corrected p -value. The question I have is why are there such large swatches of the cortical surface in the row 2 images that are labelled as log10 p = 5, when they are not included in the most significant and largest clusters that were found in the cluster summary file?
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725
[ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ]
[ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ]
