Did you see this response from a few days ago?
On 10/27/2021 11:26 AM, Douglas N. Greve wrote:
I'm not sure what you did or how to interpret that pic. If I understand, you ran a case through recon-all and created labels on that case. You then recon-all again using a totally different output where you improved the homogeneity. You now want to map the labels you created on the 1st run to the 2nd run. Is that right?
On 10/22/2021 4:58 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
External Email - Use Caution
Hi there
I created labels on surfaces of subjects (chimp) registered to a particular volumetric template. The labels were created on the surfaces in Freeview using Freesurfer 7.1.
Since creating these labels, I improved the intensity inhomogeneity in the scans and re-ran the surfaces. When I try to use mri_label2label to transpose the labels to the new surfaces of each subject, the labels do not fall exactly where they should. *In fact, the surfaces themselves have a slight translation in them (see snapshot).* I assume this is because my registration to the template that I did prior to running recon-all is differing somehow between the 2 groups. *However, I thought that this should not matter since mri_label2label --regmethod surface is using the sphere.reg to fsaverage. *
I am wondering if there is anything I can do to improve mri_label2label to avoid editing the labels manually?
Thank you for your time, Trisanna
--
/Trisanna Sprung-Much, PhD/ /Research Associate/ /McGill University / /Montreal Neurological Institute/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://secure-web.cisco.com/1q5tLeMBonQ68z0n88Yl920FIxC8aFXA_OZHvYSqEM50UX8...