Great, I will give that a shot. In the seeding ROI should I combine the gm and wm labels or is the GM sufficient to encapsulate, say, the superior temporal gurus GM and WM?
Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Sean - Do you mean that the streamlines go through non-brain voxels? You could you a slightly dilated version of the aparc+aseg as a mask. You can use bbregister to map it to the subject's DWI space.
a.y
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Sean Hatton wrote:
Hello FS Gurus,
I would like to export FS labels as seed regions for deterministic tractography in TrackVis (probabilistic is not appropriate in this investigation). I run mri_label2vol with “--proj abs -4 0 .1” to try and grow the label into the WM and exclude GM. While I get a biologically plausible ROIs and plenty of good streamlines, I do get some stray streamlines that jump across the sulci into adjacent gyri which (I have read) is an artefact of seeding from GM. Have I got the right approach? Should I create an inverse intracranial volume mask as an exclusion mask? Something else?
Kind regards,
Sean Hatton Brain & Mind Research Institute University of Sydney, Australia. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.