Thank you Doug, Kindly I have one more question.. What is the best way to deal with unsegmented white matter in wmparc.mgz and is there any other atlases that can give me better results regarding this huge structure of unsegmented white matter?
Mohamad
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:03 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] aparc+aseg OR wmparc
yes On 06/26/2014 04:49 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Hi Fs Experts,
I am working on FA ROI analysis for my subjects, I did the following:
1.Mri_vol2vol -mov fa.nii -reg register.dat -fstarg -interp nearest -o fa.anat.mgh
2.Mri_segstat wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt -I fa.anat.mgh -sum fa.stats
Then I used less fa.stats in order to view the statistics results... my question here is:
can I use aparc+aseg.mgz instead of wmparc.mgz in my command line in step 2 in order to exclude the unsegmentedwhite matter in the output stats.
Thanks,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer