It was indeed using mri_em_register_cuda. I will check with a different card. Thanks a lot, Hemant
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
which binary was running when this error occurred? consult the recon-all.log to find out. if it was mri_em_register_cuda or mri_ca_register_cuda, then it would appear that it is attempting to use a function not supported by compute capability 1.0, which means your card is not supported.
n.
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 14:01 -0400, Hemant Bokil wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for generating those files. The code ran through more steps this time (with the new files) but I now have the following error:
Cuda error: MRImeanX kernel failed in file 'mrimean_cuda.cu' in line 578 : invalid device function. register_mri: find_optimal_transform
Would you be able to recompile and put that on the server ? Alternately, if the source code is online and there are instructions for the recompile, I could do it myself. Many thanks,
Hemant
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hemant,
We dont have any cards here that are compute capability 1.0. Our test cards are all 1.3 or higher. We do compile with -arch sm_11 (compute capability 1.1). I've recompiled mri_em_register_cuda and mri_ca_register_cuda with -arch sm_10 and put them here:https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/misc/linux-centos4_x8...
i dont know if they will work for you though. n. On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 12:29 -0400, R Edgar wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Hemant Bokil <hemantbokil@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There was another thread a while back on the freesurfer website: A user > > reported a similar problem to mine and another user responded that the > > problem was with CUDA Compute Capability (See the link below- > >http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg14906.html)
> > > > My card is a Quadro 4600 which has Compute Capability 1.0. Do I need a card > > with a higher Compute Capability ? > > I didn't catch that. You absolutely need a more capable card. You > should check with Nick as to the minimum supported, but you don't get > the full benefits until you get to Comp. Cap. 2.0. > > Richard > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.