Re: [Freesurfer] Surface edits

you need to fill the wm with 255 so we know it's an edit.

Bruce On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:

Hi, When editing the wm, is it better to fill sections (eg., when thickening temporal lobe strands) using a brush with intensity at 255, or 110? I've noticed that if I fill using 110 and run autorecon2-cp with -keepwmedits the fill is basically ignored when the wm is re-segmented. Just wandering why 255 would be better than 110? Thanks, Alex

Alex Fornito M.Psych/PhD (clin. neuro.) candidate Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Psychology The University of Melbourne alexander.fornito@wh.org.au

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer