no, I don't think so. There is some randomness in the algorithm (e.g. sampling paths through the volume), but I thought we used the same random seed each time to ensure repeatability. Was it on the same machine? What was your command line? And How big were the differences?
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Phoolan Devi wrote:
I mean the hippocampal volume in the aseg... so, it's not normal?
Bruce Fischl Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:24:44 -0700
do you mean the hippocampal volume in the aseg or in the subfields? On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, anonymous anonymous wrote:
Hi all, Without noticing I run recon-all twice on the same scan of the same subject and we noticed there are some differences, at least in the hippocampal volume estimation.
Is it normal? If it is, why is it so?
Thank you so much for your help
This is a great community!
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.