Re: [Freesurfer] S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.label

Hi Esther

I don't see a volume overlay, just one on the inflated surface. Is that what you mean? If not, can you resend and explain?

Bruce

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Esther Walton wrote:

Thanks so much for your input.

Could somebody please answer the second part of the question? That is, ignoring the fact that the label looks a bit weird as it is, is the overlay between the label and the volume okay, as seen in the second file I attached in my first email? If not, any idea what could have gone wrong?

Thanks for all your help,

Esther

Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:36:06 +0200 From: christophe.destrieux@univ-tours.fr To: estherkillat@hotmail.com CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.label

Hi Esther

I had a look to the 2005 aparc for fsaverage and the intraparietal sulcus is indeed weird.

Why don't you use the 2009 version of the atlas that includes major improvements ; this parcellation is fully described in

Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. ; Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E. ; Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):1-15

I let Bruce or Doug answer the second part of your question ; cheers

PS I attached a snapshot of the 2009 parcellation for the same hemi