Hi Marie, I have not seen a publication on it. I've played around with it a bit and could not convince myself that there was a huge win in using 2, but it also depends a bit on your acquisition. If you have a lot of acceleration or really small voxels, then maybe it makes a bigger difference. Also, if you have a population that moves a lot, it might be a good idea to get to scans even if you only use one doug
On 07/15/2013 02:55 PM, Marie Schaer wrote:
Hi all,
Small question related to the number of structural runs required for optimal results: I was wondering whether someone tested the assumption that using two scans rather than one improves the segmentation process and the cortical surface reconstruction / thickness estimation? I've not been able to find any publication on it, but maybe my search was not extensive enough.
Thanks a lot for your answer,
Marie
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer