it comes down to have you smooth it. If you do it in the volume, then you need to smooth it in the volume, and that is an invalid analysis with MG.
On 10/13/17 8:42 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Hi Doug,
I wonder what is the difference between this approach (mri_surf2vol) as opposed to doing the MRTM2 modelling on the MGX GM output (58 frames), which will give us the bp.nii.gz in volume space?
Thanks.
Best Wishes, Elijah
On 13 Oct 2017, at 16:19, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
do you mean you want to map the surface-based data into the volume? If so, you can use mri_surf2vol. If you want to analyze your pet data in the volume you can just do that with mri_glmfit
On 10/5/17 4:59 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Hi Doug,
Referring to the PETSURFER tutorial for dynamic PET data, I am wondering if it is possible to obtain a volume-based equivalent of mrtm2.lh.sm05/bp.nii.gz? As I understand, bp.nii.gz is the partial-volumed corrected output that has been sampled onto the fsaverage surface.
Thanks for your time again.
Best Wishes, Elijah
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer