19 May
2017
19 May
'17
10:44 a.m.
In writing a paper of longitudinal changes in a large heterogeneous population with no group comparisons, what would be considered "more important" to include: absolute ROI volumes, or volumes corrected for ICV?
Using ICV corrected volumes makes sense when comparing groups, but when just describing population changes over time, for example a cross section of a population over a lifespan, is it better to use absolute volumes, corrected volumes, or both?