That vertex (# 130) is just on the border with cuneus, so technically the information is correct
On 01/17/2017 11:29 AM, Martin Juneja wrote:
Hi FreeSurfer community,
I am sorry for reposting the following questions in the discussion forum:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Martin Juneja* <mj70481@gmail.com mailto:mj70481@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:56 PM Subject: QDEC versus Terminal annotation To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Hi,
I am comparing cortical thickness measures between controls and patients. I displayed the results in qdec. I found that cluster is showing significant difference in thickness between controls and patients (controls having more thickness than patients).
In terminal, its showing output as:
ClusterNo Max VtxMax Size(mm2) TalX TalY TalZ NVtxs Annotation
1 2.6021 130 1285.86 11.5 -89.5 21.1 1764superiorparietal
I am not an expert in anatomy but when looking at the cluster in qdec (please find it attached), it seems like the cluster is not superior parietal as shown in terminal and even TAL coordinates are not matching with standard superior parietal lobe coordinates. When I click on find cluster in qdec, shouldn't cursor on that cluster show the same area shown in terminal?
Could you please share your thoughts on this, why the area displayed in terminal window is not matching with the one shown in qdec ?
Thanks.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer