On 07/18/2012 11:14 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
I think that the LGI is a very smooth measure, so even if you only smoothed by 15mm, there is a lot of smoothness in the unsmoothed data. This is what fwhm.dat is picking up. What happens if you do not smooth the data? What fwhm do you get? doug
On 07/18/2012 08:02 AM, jm wrote:
Dear Freesurfer Team:
I would like some information on FWHM.dat folder glmdir and its relationship with mri_glmfit-sim. It happens that when I use mri_glmfit-sim with --cache-in can't find the data for fwhm 51 - which is logical because they exist only to 1..30, but my data were smoothed previously for fwhm 15 (pial_lgi). That interpretation would take this outcome? Something could go wrong when he observed these differences between the smoothing of my data and the reported in fwhm.dat
thanks in advance
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
if I not smooth lgi data I get fwhm=13.2 into fwhm.dat