The uncorrected results will be exactly the same. The corrected results should be more significant
On 8/18/2020 7:44 PM, Erin Moe wrote:
External Email - Use CautionHi Doug, Thanks for the prompt reply. I did use the label option in mri_glmfit, but it seemed to just show the same results as the whole brain analysis but for only in the region defined by the label. When I load the sig scalar into QDEC from the label analysis as well as sig scalar from the whole brain analysis, the results looks exactly the same within the region that I have labeled. Wouldn’t constraining the analysis to just the region defined by the label potentially increase the power and therefore the significance? When I compare the significant clusters from both analyses they show the same values. My apologies if this is not the case, I am a bit rusty with my stats. Thanks again for all the help! Erin
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer