External Email - Use Caution
Thank you for your advice!
Best regards, Sunah.
2020년 9월 14일 (월) 오후 9:50, Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. < JIGLESIASGONZALEZ@mgh.harvard.edu>님이 작성:
Dear Sunah,
I would use the T1 alone.
Cheers,
/E
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
*From: *freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of 최선아 / 학생 / 뇌인지과학과 kis02204@snu.ac.kr *Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Date: *Monday, September 14, 2020 at 03:16 *To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject: *[Freesurfer] Segmentation of hippocampus and amygdala: using an additional scan with low-pixel
External Email - Use Caution *Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
I am attempting a quality check for my segmentation using an additional scan. My segmentation of hippocampal subfields and nuclei of the amygdala using an additional scan were successfully done. However, I am not sure it is better to use an additional scan since its pixel density is low. I used a T1 image with 0.977*0.977*1(mm, x*y*z axis) pixel, and T2 FLAIR image with 0.688*0.688*6(mm, x*y*z axis) pixel. *Is it okay to use an additional scan having a big pixel size such as 6mm? Can I still say that the segmentation with the additional scan is more reliable than solely using a T1 scan?* I checked the outputs using freeview, but it was difficult to conclude.
- Freesurfer
version: freesurfer-linux-centos7_x86_64-7.1.0-20200511-813297b
- Platform: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
Thanks for your help.
Thanks.
Sunah.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer