And would placing control points in the filled part work? Or maybe at the base of the strand, before the filled part?
Also, It seems that if I run autorecon2-cp after making pial edits to brain volume, the edits are ignored, and a new brain volume is generated, ie., my edits to the brain volume are no longer there. Does autorecon2-pial have to be run as a separate process, after autorecon2-cp? Thanks again, Alex
Alex Fornito M.Psych/PhD (clin. neuro.) candidate Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Psychology The University of Melbourne alexander.fornito@wh.org.au
________________________________
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Fri 14/10/2005 9:13 PM To: Fornito, Alexander Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Surface edits
you need to fill the wm with 255 so we know it's an edit.
Bruce On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi, When editing the wm, is it better to fill sections (eg., when thickening temporal lobe strands) using a brush with intensity at 255, or 110? I've noticed that if I fill using 110 and run autorecon2-cp with -keepwmedits the fill is basically ignored when the wm is re-segmented. Just wandering why 255 would be better than 110? Thanks, Alex
Alex Fornito M.Psych/PhD (clin. neuro.) candidate Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Psychology The University of Melbourne alexander.fornito@wh.org.au
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer