I see. Could be we specifically test for that and stop processing. It is a bad idea to average from different resolutions. Probably averaging is not even helpful at all, especially with newer images.
Anyway, if someone points me at some data, I can take a look.
Best, Martin
On 05/31/2016 01:34 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
I tried this recently and it failed. I did not pursue it any further
On 05/31/2016 01:32 PM, Martin Reuter wrote:
Do you mean several inputs for motion correction (averaging), or for a longitudinal study?
I haven't tested it, but for averaging, we use mri_robust_template and I see no reason why it should not work. It probably reslices at the resolution of the first input to create rawavg and then conforms that.
Best, Martin
On 05/31/2016 10:13 AM, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:
hi folks,
does recon-all work if the input T1s for the same participant have different resolutions? (i don't have a dataset to test, but trying to debug some issues another group has been having).
cheers,
satra
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Martin Reuter, PhD Assistant Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School Assistant Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital Research Affiliate, CSAIL, MIT Phone: +1-617-724-5652 Web :http://reuter.mit.edu
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer