Re: [Freesurfer] zero cortical thickness in the lingual and precuneus

-- On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Wang, Xin wrote: > one more question: I replace the mislabeled lateral ventricle with CSF because I can not find the "none" in the FreesurfercolorLUT.txt. How to change the mislabeled lateral ventricle to none? > > Thank you, > > Xin > > ________________________________ > > From: Wang, Xin > Sent: Thu 10/7/2010 12:04 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: zero cortical thickness in the lingual and precuneus > > > > Hello, Dr. Fischl, > > I asked this quesion about zero thickness in the sulcus next to the lateral vertricle before, and corrected the wrong label of lateral vertricle in the aseg.mgz file and added white matter between lateral vertricle and this sulcus in the wm.mgz. But the problem is still exist in some slices after multiple times of correction. We have this problem in version 4.4.X to 4.5.0. > My questions are > 1) Do you have any additional suggestion to fix this bug? > 2) If not, do you have a way to exclude this problematic sulcus? In another word, can we include this sulcus in the unknown zone? I don't like to exclude entire lingual, precunneus, and pericalcarine regions from mean thickness analysis and vertex-based analysis because these three labels occupy a large part of cortex. > > Thank you in advance, > > Xin Wang > > ________________________________ > > From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Sent: Thu 10/7/2010 11:31 AM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Freesurfer Digest, Vol 80, Issue 12 > > > > Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to > freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freesurfer-owner@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..." > > >