Hi list and Michael, is there a paper that you advise me to cite for mean thickness? Thanks,
Stefano
----Messaggio originale----
Da: mharms@conte.wustl.edu
Data: 4-apr-2013 15.45
A: stdp82@virgilio.it, freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical thickness normalization
If you're studying thickness, I'm a fan of using mean cortical thickness as the covariate (since thickness is what you're studying). I've posted on this in the past. cheers,-MH -- Michael Harms, Ph.D.-----------------------------------------------------------Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental DisordersWashington University School of MedicineDepartment of Psychiatry, Box 8134660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mharms@wustl.edu From: stdp82@virgilio.it Reply-To: stdp82@virgilio.it Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 7:21 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [Freesurfer] cortical thickness normalization
Hi list, I'm reading a lot of post on this list about cortical thickness normalization. I' m noting very different results on my data when I use mean thickness or ICV as nuisance factor than no factor. I'm confuse on this topic, could you advise the best way, please? Thanks,
Stefano _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.