what missing parts do you mean? The segmentation seemed pretty reasonable, but the contrast wasn't good enough to say how accurate it was in some places On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote:
Yes it is taken at 3T. I have asked our team to provide these information about the MRIs and will let you know when I hear back. I also wanted to ask if you know a good way to refine the thalamus and fill out the missing parts within the volume? Thank you Dorsa
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: what is a "3TS" image? Do you mean it was acquired at 3T? What sequence and what parameters (TE/TR/TI/TD/flip angle)?
cheers Bruce On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote: > Hi Bruce, > that is a 3TS T1 weighted image and is taken after the patients have taken > the contrast medium. I have played with the intensities in Analyze and this > is the best I could get. Do you have any suggestions for getting better > contrast? > > Thank you > > Dorsa > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > wrote: > also, please post to the list so that others can answer! > thanks > Bruce > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote: > > Here it is. Also can you explain why the algorithm > works best with 1mm^3 > voxel size? > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom > it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you > in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > >
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer