In that case, can you just use the mean thickness values as listed in subject/stats/?h.aparc.stats ?
On 11/04/2014 10:33 AM, Smith, Michael wrote:
Hi Doug,
Just wondering if you saw my response to your questions. Haven’t heard anything from anyone else yet about my questions. Thanks in advance. In case you didn’t see my response it is below:
I made the ROI on an individual subject basis, not from fsaverage. Not sure if the labels I made came from the .aparc.annot files, what is the default of mri_annotation2label? I used the -outdir flag.
Best,
Michael S.
*From:*freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] *On Behalf Of *Douglas Greve *Sent:* Monday, November 03, 2014 9:32 AM *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Fsaverage for ROI analysis of children
Can you back up and tell us what it is you are trying to do? Where did the ROI come from and how did you create it? doug
On 11/3/14 8:56 AM, Smith, Michael wrote:
Hello all, I have been conducting an ROI analysis and following the cortical thickness ROI tutorial found here: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/VolumeRoiCorticalThickness. After going through this tutorial with a few of my subjects I’ve noticed the ROI when registered to the fsaverage template is not in the correct position. I’m guessing this is due to the nature of my subjects (children ranging from 8months-11 years old). Is there a better template I should use for this analysis? Also, when I run mri_segstats to get the cortical thickness for my ROI, will these numbers be inaccurate too? Thanks in advance! It is worth noting I am running Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0 Best, Michael S. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer