I feel somewhat uneasy simply assuming that the process worked just because it didn't exit with an error. Is my concern misplaced? Should I feel happy about submitting a ms based on freesurfer analyses that have not been independently checked?
If it is necessary/advisable to do some independent checking, are there a couple of simple things (later reconstructions) that can be checked that indicate whether all is fine, or whether it is necessary to go back and check systematically each of the various stages documented on the wiki pages?
simon
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:17:13 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] checking problems To: Feng-Xian Yan b9403208@stmail.cgu.edu.tw Cc: freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.62.0801020716430.5653@gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5"
Hi,
we don't usually stop and check anymore as things fail pretty rarely. You can look at the tutorial on the wiki for examples of the types of failures and how to fix them.
cheers, Bruce
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Feng-Xian Yan wrote:
Hi, I have some confusion. When I completely run the command, recon-all ¡Vs x249 ¡Vautorecon1, and I should stop to check for problems with intensity normalization, talairach transformation and skull stripping. How can I do to check these problems? And, which is I must do first?
Thanks.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer