Good question! It’s ok if only the hippo is covered. Cheers, /E
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.com
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Rene Seiger rene.seiger@meduniwien.ac.at Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Friday, 24 January 2020 at 12:15 To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Juan,
Thank you very much for you answer! However, I ran into another issue using the new tool: It is stated: 'Using the additional scan in isolation is advised when it is of higher resolution than the T1 while covering the whole hippocampi and amygdalae'. Can I still use this processing mode, when my high-resolution scans only have the hippocampi covered, as I am not interested in the amygdala in the first place? Or is it mandatory to have both structures fully covered within the additional scan when I want to run it in isolation? Thank you very much, René
http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/ http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/ Am 23.01.2020 um 18:09 schrieb Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.: Hi Rene, The atlases are slightly different so the outputs will be a bit different. But the segmentations will indeed be comparable. Cheers, /Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.com
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Rene Seiger rene.seiger@meduniwien.ac.atmailto:rene.seiger@meduniwien.ac.at Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 07:48 To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version
External Email - Use Caution
Dear all,
I recently saw that the page of the hippocampal module for FS6 (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields) seems to be obsolete and it looks as if this module will be replaced by a newer version in the near future (now dev version, https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmy...).
However, I am not entirely sure how those two modules differ in terms of hippocampal subfield segmentation, when the "FS60" parcellation scheme is used in the new module. It is stated that 'it mimics the FreeSurfer 6.0 hippocampal module', but is the output 1:1 comparable? Thank you very much and kind regards, René --
Dr. René Seiger Research Associate
Medical University of Vienna Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Division of General Psychiatry NEUROIMAGING LABS (NIL) - PET, MRI, EEG, TMS & Chemical Lab
Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna Phone +43 (0) 1 40400-38250 rene.seiger@meduniwien.ac.at mailto:rene.seiger@meduniwien.ac.athttp://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/
http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer