OK thanks. I see a lot of pubs using these labels. Can anyone provide any advice on how to justify using these labels in clinical populations without also collecting functional retinotopy data?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Krista
I don't think we have any idea. The labels are based purely on anatomy, but whether those areas keep their functional specification we have no idea.
let us know if you find out though! Bruce On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, krista kelly wrote:
Does anyone know of any support (i.e. articles/data) suggesting that the
V1
and V2 labels automatically created in the Freesurfer pipeline,
especially
when looking at surface area/gyrification, are valid to use with clinical populations? In particular, visually deprived populations? Thanks! Krista
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.