let us know if it works, as it will change how high a priority fixing the bug is.
cheers, Bruce On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, martijn van den heuvel wrote:
thanks, Ill try to find a Linux machine and run the average.
martijn
On 2/22/07, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
sure, sorry for the bug. If you have a linux machine around with a fair amount of ram you should be able to run them though. Not sure why the mac runs out so much more quickly.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, martijn van den heuvel wrote:
Hi bruce,
Thanks for looking into my 'maximumnumber?' problem. Good to hear that
you
have run in on 300+, at least I know it should be possible and there is
no
fixed maximum number.
Hope to hear from you,
thanks, Martijn
On 2/21/07, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Martijn,
it looks like we have a memory leak. We'll look into it and get back to you. I'm surprised you don't get past 253 with 16G of ram though. I've run it on 300 or so.
Bruce On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, martijn van den heuvel wrote:
Dear Freesurfer-list,
I'm trying to construct an average group surface map using 'make_average_subject'. My group consists of a rather large number of subjects, around 400 subjects.
Unfortunately, running 'make_average_subject' gives an error when
processing
subject 253, saying it has an 'mgh reading error' on the 'T1.mgz'.
I checked that the involved files are all oke. In addition, I have
run
'make_average_subject' several times with different group lists, but
every
time it stops at subject 253.
I'm using an Intel MacPro with 16 GB of system memory, and there is
plenty
of free memory when it runs.
Is there a maximum set on the number of subjects you can use in 'make_average_subject'? Can I reset this value?
Yours sincerely,
Martijn van den Heuvel