Can I also use mri_surfcluster as it is in qdec since I want to compare the whole brain and masked brain results?
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
you are doing it the right way. There is no difference in the uncorrected analysis. There will be a difference when you correct for multiple comparisons doug
On 03/14/2014 11:15 AM, amirhossein manzouri wrote:
Dear Experts, I have read the previous posts in the list regarding restricted ROI analysis. So I generated my label from tksurfer and used that for group difference analysis by adding --label to mri_glmfit, but the result (sig.mgh) seems just a masked version of the analysis including whole brain ( no difference in significance! ). I expected to see a different pattern of significance by limiting the region. Would you please advise if I am doing this in a right way?
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.