Petr,
The easiest way to do this is to multiply your v3.0.0 ICV values by 0.744. The fix in v3.0.2 was merely changing the scaling factor (reduced by 0.744), so rerunning all the data under v3.0.2 is not necessary to get this corrected ICV value. But if you wanted to rerun, you can just run -autorecon2. Manual edits are retained.
Nick
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 17:20 +0200, p.s.bjerkan@studmed.uio.no wrote:
Hi!
Have some subjects processed with 3.0. This version turned out to do wrong ICV-calculations. We therefore want to re-run with 3.0.2. (That version is chosen because the results will be compared with other subjects run with 3.0.2).
Just asking this to be sure:
If I re-run them now, it´s ok to run from autorecon2 (with 3.0.2) and further? That will include every manual edit and make new valid calculations in the aseg (including ICV)? Or is it necessary to think autorecon1, T1´s and legacy?
Thanks!
Petr Szulc Bjerkan
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer