Estephan Moana wrote:
Hello Freesurfer people,
I am following the FSL-Fressurfer tutorial from the June course to look at my data on both applications. I successfully was able to register my FEAT output (non-smoothed) to the FS anatomical. My questions are for the following steps:
- Is there a difference between resampling individual run COPE's to a common surface instead of resampling subject-level GFEAT COPE's (in native space)? If they are equivalent the second option seems to be less cumbersome when typing the mris_preproc command - is this a correct conclusion?
It is about the same, and yes the mris_preproc command is much simpler.
- When I display individual functional runs or GFEAT results over the subject's surface, I am basically looking at FEAT/GFEAT results, correct? So when I run a surface_based group analysis using mri_glmfit how similar/different are these results from those of a group-level FEAT analysis, assuming that I used a simple one-sample group mean and fixed-effects for both analyzes?
For as single subject or across subjects? For a single subject, they will be similar. For a group subject, you'll be using surface-based registration instead of volume based, so hopefully you'll get more power (ie, smaller but more intense clusters).
doug
Thank you.
Estephan
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer