Not for cortical analysis. You might be able to get something useful from subcortical analysis
On 1/22/19 12:15 PM, Sahnoune,Iman wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
I’m writing to ask whether clinical scans with thickness of 5mm are currently able to be analyzed using Freesurfer? This question has been asked in the archives, but it has been about 5 years so just writing to see whether that has changed or if a work around has been developed. Alternatively, the option exists to computationally make the slices thinner. Would running the software either as 5mm or thinner slices yield accurate and useful information cortically and subcortically?
Thank you in advance for your help.
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer