I attempted to get them relatively close to the same size, the surfaced one is at Zoom "2" in FS (the orig is viewed using MoJo); I didn't alter brightness or anything. I was just worried this would make my results (volume in particular) problematic. Thanks Bruce.
-Derin
Hi Derin,
the surfaces look reasonable, although the images aren't that great. Is the one with surfaces overlaid windowed up relative to the other one? It looks noisier, but maybe that's because you turned the brightness up. Still, if they are old data there's not much you can do
cheers, Bruce
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Derin Cobia wrote:
Should I expect this kind of quality/resolution from my FS images based on the original scan (see attached images)? These are older scans that I've been given, and I just want to make sure that the image quality isn't introducing any unnecessary error, or is not "good enough" for FS. Thanks.
-Derin
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer