Hi weiwei
if the aseg looks good you don't have to worry about how the subcortical structures look in the brainmask - it's irrelevant. Not sure about the pial surfaces - we find the surfaces in 6.0 more accurate than 5.3, but maybe not for your specific sequence? It's hard to say
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, ? ? wrote:
dear FS community: now i have more than 200 subjects which already finished recon-all with 5.3, since 6.0 released, i wonder should i re-run them with 6.0 as lots of changes like different surf-map and registration. i ran a bit of them as test and i found the pial problems were more than 5.3, and it seems some subcortical structures were vanished in the brainmask.mgz, though the aseg.mgz looked good. i wanna ask is my problem serious or it is usual with 6.0, and which version you think is better for cortical volume and surface thickness reserch? best regards
weiwei west china hospital
weiqi77777@live.com