Regarding this issue with the old version of mris_anatomical_stats, will problems with rh.area effect any of the other results? Or are there any bugs effecting other anatomical stats besides rh.area?
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:58:06 -0500 From: Doug Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] area file To: Marie Schaer marie.schaer@medecine.unige.ch Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Message-ID: 4368FE2E.2020503@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
We found a problem with this computation about a year ago (11/12/2004 to be specific). I think I sent an email about it to the list. Any releases prior to that date will have this error in the area computations. Can you try it with a more recent release?
Sasha Wolosin Research Assistant Developmental Cognitive Neurology Kennedy Krieger Institute 707 N. Broadway Baltimore, MD 21205 ph: (443) 923-9270 wolosin@kennedykrieger.org
Disclaimer: The materials in this e-mail are private and may contain Protected Health Information. Please note that e-mail is not necessarily confidential or secure. Your use of e-mail constitutes your acknowledgment of these confidentiality and security limitations. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu