If you're studying thickness, I'm a fan of using mean cortical thickness as
the covariate (since thickness is what you're studying). I've posted on
this in the past.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mharms@wustl.edu
From:
stdp82@virgilio.it
Reply-To:
stdp82@virgilio.it
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 7:21 AM
To:
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] cortical thickness normalization
Hi list,
I'm reading a lot of post on this list about cortical thickness
normalization.
I' m noting very different results on my data when I use mean thickness or
ICV as nuisance factor than no factor.
I'm confuse on this topic, could you advise the best way, please?
Thanks,
Stefano
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information
in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If
you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains
patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly dispose of the e-mail.