thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high....
best
Trisanna
-- Ph.D. Candidate McGill University Integrated Program in Neuroscience Psychology
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much < trisanna.sprung.much@gmail.com> wrote:
thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high....
best
Trisanna
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Trisanna
sorry, there is no easy answer to this question. It depends on what you are trying to do.
Bruce On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
Hi there I am wondering whether there is an acceptable FWHM to use to smooth
surface
data (for instance, a probability map)?
Many thanks
Trisanna
Ph.D. CandidateMcGill University Integrated Program in Neuroscience Psychology
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
what is a sulcal probability map? On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high.... best
Trisanna
-- Ph.D. CandidateMcGill University Integrated Program in Neuroscience Psychology
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much trisanna.sprung.much@gmail.com wrote: thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high.... best
Trisanna
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Trisanna
sorry, there is no easy answer to this question. It depends on what you are trying to do. Bruce On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote: > Hi there > I am wondering whether there is an acceptable FWHM to use to smooth surface > data (for instance, a probability map)? > > Many thanks > > Trisanna > -- > Ph.D. CandidateMcGill University > Integrated Program in Neuroscience > Psychology > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Bruce
What I mean is - labeled sulci in volume space, overlaid onto surfaces and then averaged across subjects.
Trisanna
-- Ph.D. Candidate McGill University Integrated Program in Neuroscience Psychology
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what is a sulcal probability map? On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high.... best
Trisanna
-- Ph.D. CandidateMcGill University Integrated Program in Neuroscience Psychology
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much trisanna.sprung.much@gmail.com wrote: thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high.... best
Trisanna
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Trisanna
sorry, there is no easy answer to this question. It depends on what you are trying to do. Bruce On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote: > Hi there > I am wondering whether there is an acceptable FWHM to use to smooth surface > data (for instance, a probability map)? > > Many thanks > > Trisanna > -- > Ph.D. CandidateMcGill University > Integrated Program in Neuroscience > Psychology > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
Trisanna Sprung-Much