No, the cerebellum is not attached.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Blessy M blessam@gmail.com wrote:
I have a MPRAGE scan, with slight atrophy on right side of brain. Recon-all is crashing (see error below). Can anyone help me with this, so I can get a reasonably parcellated brain?
*CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=151, convex hull=90) After retessellation of defect 6, euler #=-52 (54998,159712,104662) : difference with theory (-57) = -5
CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=27939, convex hull=5437) normal vector of length zero at vertex 60965 with 0 faces vertex 60965 has 0 face Numerical result out of range Linux compute-0-4.local 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 15:50:53 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
recon-all -s . exited with ERRORS at Sat Sep 1 02:01:53 EDT 2012*
thanks
Blessy
Does anyone have any suggestions on what might have gone wrong here? Should I send the image?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Blessy M blessam@gmail.com wrote:
No, the cerebellum is not attached.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Blessy M blessam@gmail.com wrote:
I have a MPRAGE scan, with slight atrophy on right side of brain. Recon-all is crashing (see error below). Can anyone help me with this, so I can get a reasonably parcellated brain?
*CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=151, convex hull=90) After retessellation of defect 6, euler #=-52 (54998,159712,104662) : difference with theory (-57) = -5
CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=27939, convex hull=5437) normal vector of length zero at vertex 60965 with 0 faces vertex 60965 has 0 face Numerical result out of range Linux compute-0-4.local 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 15:50:53 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
recon-all -s . exited with ERRORS at Sat Sep 1 02:01:53 EDT 2012*
thanks
Blessy
that is a pretty big defect (vertices=27939). Can you check the ?h.orig.nofix and see if anything is dramatically wrong with it? Is the skull attached? The cerebellum? If you upload it we can certainly take a look
cheers Bruce On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Blessy M wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on what might have gone wrong here? Should I send the image?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Blessy M blessam@gmail.com wrote: No, the cerebellum is not attached.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Blessy M <blessam@gmail.com> wrote: I have a MPRAGE scan, with slight atrophy on right side of brain. Recon-all is crashing (see error below). Can anyone help me with this, so I can get a reasonably parcellated brain? CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=151, convex hull=90) After retessellation of defect 6, euler #=-52 (54998,159712,104662) : difference with theory (-57) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=27939, convex hull=5437) normal vector of length zero at vertex 60965 with 0 faces vertex 60965 has 0 face Numerical result out of range Linux compute-0-4.local 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 15:50:53 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all -s . exited with ERRORS at Sat Sep 1 02:01:53 EDT 2012 thanks Blessy
So the left side has gone all the way through, and "lh.volume" was created, but it looks like the right side has some files missing.
Can I just upload the raw data file? Should I attach it in my email?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
that is a pretty big defect (vertices=27939). Can you check the ?h.orig.nofix and see if anything is dramatically wrong with it? Is the skull attached? The cerebellum? If you upload it we can certainly take a look
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Blessy M wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on what might have gone wrong here?
Should I send the image?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Blessy M blessam@gmail.com wrote: No, the cerebellum is not attached.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Blessy M <blessam@gmail.com> wrote: I have a MPRAGE scan, with slight atrophy on right side of brain. Recon-all is crashing (see error below). Can anyone help me with this, so I can get a reasonably parcellated brain? CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=151, convex hull=90) After retessellation of defect 6, euler #=-52 (54998,159712,104662) : difference with theory (-57) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=27939, convex hull=5437) normal vector of length zero at vertex 60965 with 0 faces vertex 60965 has 0 face Numerical result out of range Linux compute-0-4.local 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 15:50:53 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all -s . exited with ERRORS at Sat Sep 1 02:01:53 EDT 2012 thanks BlessyThe information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
you can ftp it Bruce On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Blessy M wrote:
So the left side has gone all the way through, and "lh.volume" was created, but it looks like the right side has some files missing.
Can I just upload the raw data file? Should I attach it in my email?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: that is a pretty big defect (vertices=27939). Can you check the ?h.orig.nofix and see if anything is dramatically wrong with it? Is the skull attached? The cerebellum? If you upload it we can certainly take a look
cheers Bruce On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Blessy M wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions on what might have gone wrong here? Should I send the image? On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Blessy M <blessam@gmail.com> wrote: No, the cerebellum is not attached. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Blessy M <blessam@gmail.com> wrote: I have a MPRAGE scan, with slight atrophy on right side of brain. Recon-all is crashing (see error below). Can anyone help me with this, so I can get a reasonably parcellated brain? CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=151, convex hull=90) After retessellation of defect 6, euler #=-52 (54998,159712,104662) : difference with theory (-57) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=27939, convex hull=5437) normal vector of length zero at vertex 60965 with 0 faces vertex 60965 has 0 face Numerical result out of range Linux compute-0-4.local 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 15:50:53 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all -s . exited with ERRORS at Sat Sep 1 02:01:53 EDT 2012 thanks BlessyThe information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Blessy M -
Bruce Fischl