Dear Freesurfer,
The entorhinal has different volume and thickness in the "?h_aparc.stats" & "?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats" files. Could any one explain way and which one should be used?
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Mohamed
One (aparc) is derived from manual labels registered into the subject space. The other is derived from an exvivo label.
On 02/18/2016 10:23 AM, Mohamed Ali Bahri wrote:
Dear Freesurfer,
The entorhinal has different volume and thickness in the "?h_aparc.stats" & "?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats" files. Could any one explain way and which one should be used?
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Mohamed
The ex vivo is probably more accurate since it was created by directly visualizing the relevant cytoarchitectur
On Feb 18, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
One (aparc) is derived from manual labels registered into the subject space. The other is derived from an exvivo label.
On 02/18/2016 10:23 AM, Mohamed Ali Bahri wrote: Dear Freesurfer,
The entorhinal has different volume and thickness in the "?h_aparc.stats" & "?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats" files. Could any one explain way and which one should be used?
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Mohamed
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you very much for your kind answer.
Mohamed
On 18/02/16 23:22, Bruce Fischl wrote:
The ex vivo is probably more accurate since it was created by directly visualizing the relevant cytoarchitectur
On Feb 18, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
One (aparc) is derived from manual labels registered into the subject space. The other is derived from an exvivo label.
On 02/18/2016 10:23 AM, Mohamed Ali Bahri wrote: Dear Freesurfer,
The entorhinal has different volume and thickness in the "?h_aparc.stats" & "?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats" files. Could any one explain way and which one should be used?
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Mohamed
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu