The ex vivo is probably more accurate since it was created by directly visualizing the relevant cytoarchitectur
On Feb 18, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
One (aparc) is derived from manual labels registered into the subject space. The other is derived from an exvivo label.
On 02/18/2016 10:23 AM, Mohamed Ali Bahri wrote: Dear Freesurfer,
The entorhinal has different volume and thickness in the "?h_aparc.stats" & "?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats" files. Could any one explain way and which one should be used?
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Mohamed
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer