Hi Rose,

you should post to the list as you will get better and faster answers (although this time I know it didn't work so well for you).

I believe Martin published these numbers

Bruce

On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Van Der Deijl, Rosanne wrote:

Dear Bruce,

I think my message might have gotten lost in the Freesurfer mailing list stream, so that's why I'm sending it to you again. Thank you in advance for your help!

Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:08:24 +0000 From: "Van Der Deijl, Rosanne" RVANDERDEIJL@mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] test-retest variability small subcortical         regions To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Message-ID:         1D58C89E05A85B4E9512CDEA158803141CB99976@PHSX10MB5.partners.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Bruce,

I mean for the longitudinal analysis. Forgot to mention this, sorry!

Kind regards,

Rose

Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:39:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Test-retest reliability small subcortical         regions To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Message-ID:         alpine.LRH.2.20.1708111239430.24300@door.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Hi Rose

do you mean cross-sectional or longitudinal analysis?

cheers Bruce

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Van Der Deijl, Rosanne wrote:

...

Dear Freesurfer team,

I was wondering what the test-retest reliability is of comparing small regions in the subcortical volume, e.g. the amygdala. Has this improved

with

...

the 6.0 version?

Thank you!

Kind regards,

Rose