Hi Rose,
you should post to the list as you will get better and faster answers (although this time I know it didn't work so well for you).
I believe Martin published these numbers
Bruce
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Van Der Deijl, Rosanne wrote:
Dear Bruce,
I think my message might have gotten lost in the Freesurfer mailing list stream, so that's why I'm sending it to you again. Thank you in advance for your help!
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:08:24 +0000 From: "Van Der Deijl, Rosanne" RVANDERDEIJL@mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] test-retest variability small subcortical regions To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Message-ID: 1D58C89E05A85B4E9512CDEA158803141CB99976@PHSX10MB5.partners.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Bruce,
I mean for the longitudinal analysis. Forgot to mention this, sorry!
Kind regards,
Rose
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:39:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Test-retest reliability small subcortical regions To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Message-ID: alpine.LRH.2.20.1708111239430.24300@door.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Hi Rose
do you mean cross-sectional or longitudinal analysis?
cheers Bruce
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Van Der Deijl, Rosanne wrote:
Dear Freesurfer team,
I was wondering what the test-retest reliability is of comparing small regions in the subcortical volume, e.g. the amygdala. Has this improved
with
the 6.0 version?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Rose