Hi Ri

it depends on how you do the retinotopy (field strength, # of coil elements, voxel size, etc....). In our comparisons, the folding patterns predict the border location to about 2.5mm, which is probably better than you can get with retinotopy.

I believe the ?h.V1.label comes from the Zilles/Amunts histological data, and should be mostly equivalent to the Hinds stuff.

cheers Bruce

On Mon, 23 May 2011, Ritobrato Datta wrote:

Hello All,

I noticed that that there is a fsaverage/label/?h.V1.label

Is this label created from the Hinds and Fischl method ? Can someone give some details abt it ?

Also for individual subjects, when I run the V1 estimation using Hinds and Fischl method, how accurate are the V1 / V2 border compared to retinotopy ? Or which is more accurate ?

Thanks

Ri _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer