External Email - Use Caution
Hi all you Freesurfer users!
I have scans on a person that are slightly different protocols (like 1mm voxels vs. 0.8mm voxels amongst other setting differences), and I ran them through recon-all. Is there a way to quantify which one came through with fewer errors to manually correct? I searched the archives as well as I could, but I really wasn't sure what to look for.
Thanks!
----
Wade A. Weber, MS Psychiatry Research Program Coordinator
Dell Medical School | The University of Texas at Austin o: 512-495-5217 | f: 512-495-5482 | dellmedschool.utexas.edu
Well, you could go through and correct them, then count the number of corrections:). But I don't think there is an automated procedure. You could count the number of topological defects (but these are fixed anyway). The values are in the aseg.stats file
On 4/11/19 3:38 PM, Weber, Wade A wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi all you Freesurfer users!
I have scans on a person that are slightly different protocols (like 1mm voxels vs. 0.8mm voxels amongst other setting differences), and I ran them through recon-all. Is there a way to quantify which one came through with fewer errors to manually correct? I searched the archives as well as I could, but I really wasn’t sure what to look for.
Thanks!
Wade A. Weber, MS
Psychiatry Research Program Coordinator
Dell Medical School | The University of Texas at Austin
o: 512-495-5217 | f: 512-495-5482 |**_dellmedschool.utexas.edu_
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution
I thought it might be a stretch. Thanks, though!
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 2:57 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Quantify recon-all results from different scan protocols
Well, you could go through and correct them, then count the number of corrections:). But I don't think there is an automated procedure. You could count the number of topological defects (but these are fixed anyway). The values are in the aseg.stats file
On 4/11/19 3:38 PM, Weber, Wade A wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi all you Freesurfer users!
I have scans on a person that are slightly different protocols (like 1mm voxels vs. 0.8mm voxels amongst other setting differences), and I ran them through recon-all. Is there a way to quantify which one came through with fewer errors to manually correct? I searched the archives as well as I could, but I really wasn't sure what to look for.
Thanks!
Wade A. Weber, MS
Psychiatry Research Program Coordinator
Dell Medical School | The University of Texas at Austin
o: 512-495-5217 | f: 512-495-5482 |**_dellmedschool.utexas.edu_
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. -
Weber, Wade A