External Email - Use Caution
Is Freesurfer using Neuromorphometrics’ General Segmentation Protocol, or something different?
What are the differences between different protocols?
Thanks!
Ruifeng
Hi Ruifeng
I think they are similar, but you would have to ask Neuromorphometrics about the differences. Our protocol was published in the Neuron 2002 paper and the papers it cites, which I think is also where the Neuromorphometrics’ protocol came from
Cheers Bruce
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Ruifeng Dong Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:07 AM To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution Is Freesurfer using Neuromorphometrics’ General Segmentation Protocol, or something different?
What are the differences between different protocols?
Thanks!
Ruifeng
External Email - Use Caution
Thanks, Bruce.
Actually, I am comparing the volume computations between different segmentation tools. In some software's paper, they mentioned there is a slight difference in protocol from Freesurfer and thus not easy to compare. I am wondering what the difference lies in, for example, in the way a structure is defined anatomically, or something else?
I am new to this field, and don't know if my question is clear to you.
Thanks again.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 1:29 PM Fischl, Bruce BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Ruifeng
I think they are similar, but you would have to ask Neuromorphometrics about the differences. Our protocol was published in the Neuron 2002 paper and the papers it cites, which I think is also where the Neuromorphometrics’ protocol came from
Cheers
Bruce
*From:* freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Ruifeng Dong *Sent:* Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:07 AM *To:* Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution *Is Freesurfer using Neuromorphometrics’ General Segmentation Protocol, or something different?
What are the differences between different protocols?
Thanks!
Ruifeng
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://secure-web.cisco.com/17gWda3PW77cFDiaz-i-4Fwl8_ZdYqi63-Q-QRDk3OkrJnQ... The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEg... < https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEg... .
Yes, that can definitely be the case. Some boundaries are not visible (in e.g. the accumbens) and so the border is defined by geometric means. Other times the definition of what is in or not in a structure can change (e.g. is the fimbria part of the hippocampal label?)
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Ruifeng Dong Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 2:34 PM To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution Thanks, Bruce.
Actually, I am comparing the volume computations between different segmentation tools. In some software's paper, they mentioned there is a slight difference in protocol from Freesurfer and thus not easy to compare. I am wondering what the difference lies in, for example, in the way a structure is defined anatomically, or something else?
I am new to this field, and don't know if my question is clear to you.
Thanks again.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 1:29 PM Fischl, Bruce <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edumailto:BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Ruifeng
I think they are similar, but you would have to ask Neuromorphometrics about the differences. Our protocol was published in the Neuron 2002 paper and the papers it cites, which I think is also where the Neuromorphometrics’ protocol came from
Cheers Bruce
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Ruifeng Dong Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:07 AM To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution Is Freesurfer using Neuromorphometrics’ General Segmentation Protocol, or something different?
What are the differences between different protocols?
Thanks!
Ruifeng
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurferhttps://secure-web.cisco.com/17gWda3PW77cFDiaz-i-4Fwl8_ZdYqi63-Q-QRDk3OkrJnQzMJfdWyqjpeCpXyQ-71-_BskZVELLlltoYoGGGVX45eJIt3oavRnI66WujwCzkcRoq-Z43eg54xSBFjVmj1PI5tvawonk4j27NytMy9yqeuA4ogPytRPQ_cTwcTAexBDGOSFJEgVhoGezbKlyJDKdJF-VxUC77VaA70bEZ78-kUgoeRMDKy9IuC9LBFc6D9AUBsfyjzO8liaiP1Ug13QwiL4hX7Uk-k0la8JIhOVOqCszxbPSdvCZskoZm3aiMuZp2l1m8GdAPg8dljq-K/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/compliancelinehttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEgrW-sZ_cQRtF9AM4DlBqi29dBVdGkivt3yEbKgzwgziMI9XMMfdf5rd82WaeVMo4xc8YoVZ7G3fjvaLbBnVaZj0hhmtUa2C_FGaODrEdwiMb_RszMQFgdDfu1fVkiA8sCvqmtqjdl6L_a2QbdQ9vGdTe6658aTw54OJRMB3wy3CZAzXet5lY19LBqbDb5Dgtw93NF_nk2vhQyf42z8pZds3JPdayBX6YkqYpkeiza-mO7A4cB3H8TZxl4z9hMEu0syahXDq3E4G5_IjXshQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline <MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/compliancelinehttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEgrW-sZ_cQRtF9AM4DlBqi29dBVdGkivt3yEbKgzwgziMI9XMMfdf5rd82WaeVMo4xc8YoVZ7G3fjvaLbBnVaZj0hhmtUa2C_FGaODrEdwiMb_RszMQFgdDfu1fVkiA8sCvqmtqjdl6L_a2QbdQ9vGdTe6658aTw54OJRMB3wy3CZAzXet5lY19LBqbDb5Dgtw93NF_nk2vhQyf42z8pZds3JPdayBX6YkqYpkeiza-mO7A4cB3H8TZxl4z9hMEu0syahXDq3E4G5_IjXshQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline> .
External Email - Use Caution
Thanks. I am asking Neuromorphometrics to see if they are willing to give the detailed information.
In fact, I am comparing Freesurfer with vol2Brain. However, they are using the Neuromorphometrics protocol and thus didn't run this comparison in their original paper. Therefore, I don't know how much of a systematic error I would expect if I do this. I am mostly interested in the ICV, and volumes of white matter, grey matter and subcortical structures. Therefore, I wonder if the protocol difference only occurs in more subtle structures or universal across all structures.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:37 PM Fischl, Bruce BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Yes, that can definitely be the case. Some boundaries are not visible (in e.g. the accumbens) and so the border is defined by geometric means. Other times the definition of what is in or not in a structure can change (e.g. is the fimbria part of the hippocampal label?)
*From:* freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Ruifeng Dong *Sent:* Tuesday, August 30, 2022 2:34 PM *To:* Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution *Thanks, Bruce.
Actually, I am comparing the volume computations between different segmentation tools. In some software's paper, they mentioned there is a slight difference in protocol from Freesurfer and thus not easy to compare. I am wondering what the difference lies in, for example, in the way a structure is defined anatomically, or something else?
I am new to this field, and don't know if my question is clear to you.
Thanks again.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 1:29 PM Fischl, Bruce BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Ruifeng
I think they are similar, but you would have to ask Neuromorphometrics about the differences. Our protocol was published in the Neuron 2002 paper and the papers it cites, which I think is also where the Neuromorphometrics’ protocol came from
Cheers
Bruce
*From:* freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Ruifeng Dong *Sent:* Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:07 AM *To:* Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution *Is Freesurfer using Neuromorphometrics’ General Segmentation Protocol, or something different?
What are the differences between different protocols?
Thanks!
Ruifeng
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ZlggMsb_x_yxwGYie3VRTMdWZDeqKq2CT2dHwQnSdNP5Nk... https://secure-web.cisco.com/17gWda3PW77cFDiaz-i-4Fwl8_ZdYqi63-Q-QRDk3OkrJnQzMJfdWyqjpeCpXyQ-71-_BskZVELLlltoYoGGGVX45eJIt3oavRnI66WujwCzkcRoq-Z43eg54xSBFjVmj1PI5tvawonk4j27NytMy9yqeuA4ogPytRPQ_cTwcTAexBDGOSFJEgVhoGezbKlyJDKdJF-VxUC77VaA70bEZ78-kUgoeRMDKy9IuC9LBFc6D9AUBsfyjzO8liaiP1Ug13QwiL4hX7Uk-k0la8JIhOVOqCszxbPSdvCZskoZm3aiMuZp2l1m8GdAPg8dljq-K/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://secure-web.cisco.com/1e6a-dwfVY_ohydGrOTWzGbsEuFaFM4hA57rwDHxpoDgsQH... https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEgrW-sZ_cQRtF9AM4DlBqi29dBVdGkivt3yEbKgzwgziMI9XMMfdf5rd82WaeVMo4xc8YoVZ7G3fjvaLbBnVaZj0hhmtUa2C_FGaODrEdwiMb_RszMQFgdDfu1fVkiA8sCvqmtqjdl6L_a2QbdQ9vGdTe6658aTw54OJRMB3wy3CZAzXet5lY19LBqbDb5Dgtw93NF_nk2vhQyf42z8pZds3JPdayBX6YkqYpkeiza-mO7A4cB3H8TZxl4z9hMEu0syahXDq3E4G5_IjXshQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline <*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://secure-web.cisco.com/1e6a-dwfVY_ohydGrOTWzGbsEuFaFM4hA57rwDHxpoDgsQH... https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEgrW-sZ_cQRtF9AM4DlBqi29dBVdGkivt3yEbKgzwgziMI9XMMfdf5rd82WaeVMo4xc8YoVZ7G3fjvaLbBnVaZj0hhmtUa2C_FGaODrEdwiMb_RszMQFgdDfu1fVkiA8sCvqmtqjdl6L_a2QbdQ9vGdTe6658aTw54OJRMB3wy3CZAzXet5lY19LBqbDb5Dgtw93NF_nk2vhQyf42z8pZds3JPdayBX6YkqYpkeiza-mO7A4cB3H8TZxl4z9hMEu0syahXDq3E4G5_IjXshQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline> .
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ZlggMsb_x_yxwGYie3VRTMdWZDeqKq2CT2dHwQnSdNP5Nk... The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://secure-web.cisco.com/1e6a-dwfVY_ohydGrOTWzGbsEuFaFM4hA57rwDHxpoDgsQH... < https://secure-web.cisco.com/1e6a-dwfVY_ohydGrOTWzGbsEuFaFM4hA57rwDHxpoDgsQH... .
It really can be anything. Hard to say
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Ruifeng Dong Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 3:01 PM To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution Thanks. I am asking Neuromorphometrics to see if they are willing to give the detailed information.
In fact, I am comparing Freesurfer with vol2Brain. However, they are using the Neuromorphometrics protocol and thus didn't run this comparison in their original paper. Therefore, I don't know how much of a systematic error I would expect if I do this. I am mostly interested in the ICV, and volumes of white matter, grey matter and subcortical structures. Therefore, I wonder if the protocol difference only occurs in more subtle structures or universal across all structures.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:37 PM Fischl, Bruce <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edumailto:BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Yes, that can definitely be the case. Some boundaries are not visible (in e.g. the accumbens) and so the border is defined by geometric means. Other times the definition of what is in or not in a structure can change (e.g. is the fimbria part of the hippocampal label?)
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Ruifeng Dong Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 2:34 PM To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution Thanks, Bruce.
Actually, I am comparing the volume computations between different segmentation tools. In some software's paper, they mentioned there is a slight difference in protocol from Freesurfer and thus not easy to compare. I am wondering what the difference lies in, for example, in the way a structure is defined anatomically, or something else?
I am new to this field, and don't know if my question is clear to you.
Thanks again.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 1:29 PM Fischl, Bruce <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edumailto:BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Ruifeng
I think they are similar, but you would have to ask Neuromorphometrics about the differences. Our protocol was published in the Neuron 2002 paper and the papers it cites, which I think is also where the Neuromorphometrics’ protocol came from
Cheers Bruce
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Ruifeng Dong Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:07 AM To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Segmentation protocol used by Freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution Is Freesurfer using Neuromorphometrics’ General Segmentation Protocol, or something different?
What are the differences between different protocols?
Thanks!
Ruifeng
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurferhttps://secure-web.cisco.com/17gWda3PW77cFDiaz-i-4Fwl8_ZdYqi63-Q-QRDk3OkrJnQzMJfdWyqjpeCpXyQ-71-_BskZVELLlltoYoGGGVX45eJIt3oavRnI66WujwCzkcRoq-Z43eg54xSBFjVmj1PI5tvawonk4j27NytMy9yqeuA4ogPytRPQ_cTwcTAexBDGOSFJEgVhoGezbKlyJDKdJF-VxUC77VaA70bEZ78-kUgoeRMDKy9IuC9LBFc6D9AUBsfyjzO8liaiP1Ug13QwiL4hX7Uk-k0la8JIhOVOqCszxbPSdvCZskoZm3aiMuZp2l1m8GdAPg8dljq-K/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/compliancelinehttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEgrW-sZ_cQRtF9AM4DlBqi29dBVdGkivt3yEbKgzwgziMI9XMMfdf5rd82WaeVMo4xc8YoVZ7G3fjvaLbBnVaZj0hhmtUa2C_FGaODrEdwiMb_RszMQFgdDfu1fVkiA8sCvqmtqjdl6L_a2QbdQ9vGdTe6658aTw54OJRMB3wy3CZAzXet5lY19LBqbDb5Dgtw93NF_nk2vhQyf42z8pZds3JPdayBX6YkqYpkeiza-mO7A4cB3H8TZxl4z9hMEu0syahXDq3E4G5_IjXshQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline <MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/compliancelinehttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1DZQ0DKuOLID36co4hAxKxpWGcB8kDXH_fyCBBLD0J3lWEgrW-sZ_cQRtF9AM4DlBqi29dBVdGkivt3yEbKgzwgziMI9XMMfdf5rd82WaeVMo4xc8YoVZ7G3fjvaLbBnVaZj0hhmtUa2C_FGaODrEdwiMb_RszMQFgdDfu1fVkiA8sCvqmtqjdl6L_a2QbdQ9vGdTe6658aTw54OJRMB3wy3CZAzXet5lY19LBqbDb5Dgtw93NF_nk2vhQyf42z8pZds3JPdayBX6YkqYpkeiza-mO7A4cB3H8TZxl4z9hMEu0syahXDq3E4G5_IjXshQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline> . _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurferhttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1ZlggMsb_x_yxwGYie3VRTMdWZDeqKq2CT2dHwQnSdNP5NktSqhya22no3Ur-R9BwWZUQcisLDJ_z6h8GXl1WzVlBtDFhQaML21YCU61wqF2TtVXQ8ndwf5rDf-dBne0Cetd4hFw_qPwgcJY0UW0aHkuf2h5EdfVV3GJ3MXeuTm_hNCQ-bhBn9_NITdlIKvFPo03OQsVYkfY94A24xYhBOYbKmSpTzz9ETF9QSK1SmX7n_EF5GXjisOgNQcVxTsd8K3ZnoTeKiZYNLjRV6HErTFrnh_YIiWQh3-jxJKoDbgMdKotfTExCWVf_FRpUxRa8nhSlnyMeqLClkbwzH4KrXw/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/compliancelinehttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1e6a-dwfVY_ohydGrOTWzGbsEuFaFM4hA57rwDHxpoDgsQH4UdEtqYY8TS1uixJY-0SnyQB63wWhSRCJHqaYAz4DswgAscaSRoBYfLy5I9eh5w3K6CaaYt6MPiEIHLpDAi9fOQAQHtQcfWVpFA-RiBD9H_5iR4WmgNpQf5VrbRG6044aI6WwYBD0z_2WytUPQLFcNo68dcHgbY6TzsnlanalukYe1DXnRI8HvZ6vuhNsyg5w7fRhLjvgcMzuLsEw9hSYPL1V9UVbWhr83wohSwENi0UZ-oJhz8bLQU6i-UPHZ3nMXcueQEc0-Au-dbs6FheU3EM59gaDKsXLKilCIEw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline <MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/compliancelinehttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1e6a-dwfVY_ohydGrOTWzGbsEuFaFM4hA57rwDHxpoDgsQH4UdEtqYY8TS1uixJY-0SnyQB63wWhSRCJHqaYAz4DswgAscaSRoBYfLy5I9eh5w3K6CaaYt6MPiEIHLpDAi9fOQAQHtQcfWVpFA-RiBD9H_5iR4WmgNpQf5VrbRG6044aI6WwYBD0z_2WytUPQLFcNo68dcHgbY6TzsnlanalukYe1DXnRI8HvZ6vuhNsyg5w7fRhLjvgcMzuLsEw9hSYPL1V9UVbWhr83wohSwENi0UZ-oJhz8bLQU6i-UPHZ3nMXcueQEc0-Au-dbs6FheU3EM59gaDKsXLKilCIEw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline> .
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Fischl, Bruce -
Ruifeng Dong