Dear Paul,
for the most recent version 6.0 the default is 10.
Looking at the help of mris_inflate binary and also to the source code.
Antonin
Hello Falk Chris and Antonin, The default is 55 https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_inflate. Best, PaulOn Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Falk Lüsebrink falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de wrote:
Dear Chris and Antonin,
I found in some archived message or in the wiki that the default used to be 50 iterations at some time in previous releases of FreeSurfer for standard recon-all. Therefore, I changed it to 50 as default for every resolution in the recent release. This works fine for example for up to 0.5x0.5x0.5mm3 data.
I'd also say, more is better and I have not experienced any drawbacks. Processing time doesn't seem to increase noticeably, too.
Best, Falk
*Von:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh. harvard.edu]" im Auftrag von "Antonin Skoch [a...@ikem.cz] *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2017 16:20 *An:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Betreff:* Re: [Freesurfer] Expert file for recon-all -hires
Dear Chris,
I have found that -n 15 is for our 0.7x0.7x0.7mm3 data not enough.
I determined optimal value -n 30, empirically, by looking at the shape of inflated surface with various number of iterations. Over -n 30 there was almost no further progression in inflation.
I suppose that better more than less. But maybe experts can correct me or provide better suggestion.
Antonin
Hi all,
If I'm reading this https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SubmillimeterRecon correctly, the current best practice for `-hires` is to include an expert file containing "mris_inflate -n 15", and that this should work for all voxel sizes (0.75mm)^3 - (1mm)^3? Or do we need to empirically determine the best value for a given voxel size, and if so, what should be the criteria for making this determination?
Thanks, Chris Markiewicz
hello antonin, Thanks for the correction. Best, Paul
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Antonin Skoch ansk@ikem.cz wrote:
Dear Paul,
for the most recent version 6.0 the default is 10.
Looking at the help of mris_inflate binary and also to the source code.
Antonin
Hello Falk Chris and Antonin, The default is 55 https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_inflate. Best, Paul
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Falk Lüsebrink falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de wrote:
Dear Chris and Antonin,
I found in some archived message or in the wiki that the default used to be 50 iterations at some time in previous releases of FreeSurfer for standard recon-all. Therefore, I changed it to 50 as default for every resolution in the recent release. This works fine for example for up to 0.5x0.5x0.5mm3 data.
I'd also say, more is better and I have not experienced any drawbacks. Processing time doesn't seem to increase noticeably, too.
Best, Falk
*Von:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh. harvard.edu]" im Auftrag von "Antonin Skoch [a...@ikem.cz] *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2017 16:20 *An:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Betreff:* Re: [Freesurfer] Expert file for recon-all -hires
Dear Chris,
I have found that -n 15 is for our 0.7x0.7x0.7mm3 data not enough.
I determined optimal value -n 30, empirically, by looking at the shape of inflated surface with various number of iterations. Over -n 30 there was almost no further progression in inflation.
I suppose that better more than less. But maybe experts can correct me or provide better suggestion.
Antonin
Hi all,
If I'm reading this https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SubmillimeterRecon correctly, the current best practice for `-hires` is to include an expert file containing "mris_inflate -n 15", and that this should work for all voxel sizes (0.75mm)^3 - (1mm)^3? Or do we need to empirically determine the best value for a given voxel size, and if so, what should be the criteria for making this determination?
Thanks, Chris Markiewicz
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu