External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I was running group interaction (for diagnosis and birthplace) in QDEC with gyrification as a dependent variable and age, gender as nuisance factors. In diagnosis, we have 2 groups: i) schizophrenic patients ii) healthy volunteers. Similarly, birthplace has 2 groups: i) urban ii) rural birth
For the above-said design, I got reddish yellow color results in the display tab of Qdec. So, my query is that do results indicate that patients who were born in urban have a higher gyrification index than healthy volunteers who born in urban or something else? Do I sound correct in decoding the interaction results? If not please let me know the exact meaning of the results.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks, Vittal
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
A gentle reminder pertaining to my previous email!
Thanks, *VK*
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:28 PM vittal korann vittalkorann@gmail.com wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I was running group interaction (for diagnosis and birthplace) in QDEC with gyrification as a dependent variable and age, gender as nuisance factors. In diagnosis, we have 2 groups: i) schizophrenic patients ii) healthy volunteers. Similarly, birthplace has 2 groups: i) urban ii) rural birth
For the above-said design, I got reddish yellow color results in the display tab of Qdec. So, my query is that do results indicate that patients who were born in urban have a higher gyrification index than healthy volunteers who born in urban or something else? Do I sound correct in decoding the interaction results? If not please let me know the exact meaning of the results.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks, Vittal
It depends on the order that you specified them. You will have four groups SczUrban SczRural HVUrban HVRural
The interaction will be of the form (SczUrban-SczRural)-(HVUrban-HVRural)
Look in the y.fsgd to see what the order of the classes is. You can then look in the contrast folder at C.dat to get the + and - 1s used in the contrast.
On 12/9/2020 12:58 PM, vittal korann wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I was running group interaction (for diagnosis and birthplace) in QDEC with gyrification as a dependent variable and age, gender as nuisance factors. In diagnosis, we have 2 groups: i) schizophrenic patients ii) healthy volunteers. Similarly, birthplace has 2 groups: i) urban ii) rural birth
For the above-said design, I got reddish yellow color results in the display tab of Qdec. So, my query is that do results indicate that patients who were born in urban have a higher gyrification index than healthy volunteers who born in urban or something else? Do I sound correct in decoding the interaction results? If not please let me know the exact meaning of the results.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks, Vittal
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu